When the old husband is a millionaire trying to assert that she does nothing to help business, this woman has used old love letters to prove to his case.0: 00/2: 46 Nou southern women who were older husbands, were a giant, transferred to 2.6 million Australian dollars (VND 42 billion) after using love letters in prison that he sent her for 24 years Previously to prove to her incident in front of Court.Nicola Oberman, 54, with two children with Millionaire Millionaire Shaun Collins, 53 years old, but the couple had never married. The couple remained together despite the imprisonment of the real estate boss because of the accounting violations in 1997, when they were together for a year
. In the letters, Mr. Collins promised Mrs. Oberman that she There will be a position on par with him in the property empire he planned to build when he was released in prison
He continued to create a million-member portfolio with more than 40 real estate in Kent and London in the years they work together. But after couple breaking up in 2015, Mr. Collins denying her is a common partner and affirmed that he did "almost everything" in the business, while his ex-lover was a "mothers at home", and "do not like to work " Private that he holds. Attendance, Oberman's lawyers argue that apartments, houses and shops have been purchased as part of the business activity, in which Mr. Collins promised her to be The common partner. The woman's Master Jack Watson said: "When he was in prison, Mr. Collins sent some letters to Mrs. Oberman and they discussed the business they would build together." "The pictures Undifying this is a common business, in which Mr. Collins told her that they need to 'promote' to their families to be 'strong and successful'
After Mr. Collins released in prison, he came to live with Mrs. Oberman and asked her to finance. "After that, she sold her apartment and used money to invest in the common business, as well as money Her parents give. Along with the investment, her attorneys claimed that she worked not to work for businesses on the basis of the list of properties they were building under each other's ownership. In the first judgment of the incident, Judge Leech said he believed Mrs. Oberman was becoming a major shareholder of the business because this is a common activity, not simply a decision to start from "love and affection" of Mr. Collins. Judge Leech QC announced that the property - whether kept by the common name of the couple, the name of the company or his own Collins - must be divided. From 2008 to 2015, all real estate is considered to be part of "a single portfolio of common ownership" and there has been a "clear agreement" about that.Theo Huy Nguyen / Dan Vietnamese . Dịch vụ:
Thiết kế website,
quảng cáo google,
đăng ký website bộ công thương uy tín
