About 3 years ago, Australia had confidently claimed they did not need to choose to follow US or China. But the nuclear submarine agreement between the US and Australia on September 16 showed that Canberra finally launched a tough option.02 / 4: 47 South (Artwork: Pinterest) "Strategy When becoming Australian Prime Minister 3 years ago, Scott Morrison insisted that the country would maintain close relations with China - the largest trading partner, while continuing to be an American allies." Australia is not Choice, "Scott Morrisont announced in his first foreign policy speech. However, the relationship between Australia and China has deteriorated over the years
. So on September 16, Australia Has announced a new defense agreement with the US and British. Specifically, the two countries will provide Australian technology and the ability to deploy nuclear energy-run submarines - promise to be a leap Regarding the country of this country. Australia is only a second country (after England in 1958) approached US submarine technology
American, British and Australian leaders in the ceremony to announce a new security agreement On the morning of September 16. (Photos : AP) With the 3-party agreement named Aukus above, Australia determines that "bet" all into the relationship with the US in the following generations - a "partnership forever", according to Morrison. In this gamble, Australia hopes the US will dominate in the competition with China and continue to be a dominant force in the Pacific Ocean. If everything is correct, Australia will not hesitate to participate in any military conflict with Beijing in the future.James Curran, Experienced foreign relations at Sydney University (Australia), call This is "the biggest strategic gamble in Australian history". "Australia is betting its fate on the determination and will of America in Asia," said James Curran. The other side, the ready Nuclear technology sharing shows that America needs a solid alliance in Indian Ocean - Pacific to confront China. As of 2020, China's naval forces led the world on the scale of 360 battleships, compared to US 297, according to CNN. The average US warshare size is greater, but China is even better in the number of small battleships. Not only that, China is also actively building military bases and rocket launchers in the South China Sea
The number of Chinese and American battleships. Graphics: CNN. According to security analysts, it is likely that Australia will use nuclear submarines to patrol important shipping routes, including regions in which Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia claim master Right. "Nothing to do China feels more provocative than nuclear weapons and submarines," Oriana Skylar Mastro, a member of the International Research Institute Freeman Spogli at Stanford University (USA) comment. Schedule on September 16, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said that the association with the UK and the US in the Indian Ocean - Pacific showing the tension is increasing in this area. "Australia and the Allies Entering a new era with many challenges in Indian Ocean - Pacific, "said Morrison. A submarine belongs to the Australian Naval forces. (Photo: New York Times) According to experts, work China is highly import tax with Australian goods, along with the arrest of at least two Australian citizens, which pushed this country to the US side. "Earlier, Australia would not dare choose either Faction. But the increasingly bad relationship with Beijing has made them to make a compulsory option, "said Euan Graham, Asia-Pacific Security Analyst at the International Research Institute (Singapore). The risk of course, some people are questioning about Canberra's beliefs with Washington. Since US President Barack Obama announced the policy of "rotating axis to Asia" in 2011, the Asian allies of America are still Waiting for their resources in frustration.Euan Graham said that the Agreement Aukus will ease criticisms on. "Aukus showed that the US still cares about his Asian allies." Even so, doubts About America's commitment to fighting China has not been completely removed. According to Sam Roggeveen, director of the International Security Program at Lowy Institute (Australia), in the long run, the United States can see the war with China Korea is too expensive, thereby gradually reducing its influence in Asia. "In history, the United States has never faced a formidable opponent like China," Sam Roggeve en said. China is the most "heavy" opponent in the history that the United States must confront. (Photo: Getty Images) Not only that, if the US and China conflict in the future, Australia will not be able to stand outside as before. "The United States allows Australia to approach its nuclear technology, with expectations This country will stand on to them if the military conflict occurs with China, "Hugh White, Defense expert at the Australian National University commented. But now, it seems that the Australian government has accepted every risk Ro to League with America and England. According to Richard Maude, a former Australian security official, is currently an expert of the Asian Social Policy Institute (Australia), this is T . Dịch vụ:
Thiết kế website,
quảng cáo google,
đăng ký website bộ công thương uy tín
