Although not directly interfering with the purpose and geographical range of NATO, Aukus caused great disagreements among European NATO members, capable of promoting unwanted changes in problems. Security and union topics at the European and Global levels of the European and Global 9: 00/6: Southern Southeast Multi-variable accounting for Europe, Implications may not occur immediately. However, it is impossible to ignore the fact that the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) is the most important military in the US and he has decided to participate in the Australian Security Treaty - English-American (Aukus). So far, France is the most affected country when Australia canceled the contract worth 38.6 billion euros to pay 12 diesel fuel submarines to get the US nuclear energy boat, England
. Artwork about Aukus. Source: news.com
au. America is almost dharma but forgot that this country is one of America's oldest allies and is one of the most military NATO members in the European continent. France is also an important agent in the Indian Ocean-Pacific region, Aukus's influence area, because there are about 1.6 million French citizens living in that area.Aukus started with a failure Severe diplomacy - does not include France in agreement. Although it is still not too late to overcome, because the submarines promised Australians will lose almost a decade or more to be made, there are very few US prospects to consider adding France, and also very little The motivation to join the French to join the 3 countries has "stabbed into the back". This wish can also deteriorate the rift relationship between the US and Europe, England and Europe. This is a two-bladed knife - is beneficial for China because it is sanging the disease between the powers, and it is also a motivation for France, and maybe both the European Union (EU) in general .Although there have been agreements between you and France, such as the Lancaster House Treaty, how both countries pursue their foreign policy at the continent and individual level, will determine the strength Or soft for both EU and NATO. The crackdown can open the door for the idea of larger autonomy of Europe
Germany is bothering his general election, allowing France to take advantage of this to perform a more antagonistic role to promote further independence of the EU. Military surface, Aukus does not directly cause termites Threaten to China or region. However, it signals a very strategic game between all participants. The treaty has a positive impact on him, the country behind Brexit, who considered this Aukus a small victory against Europe. The United Kingdom finally escaped Eu.aukus's nusal also strengthened the global policy that he pursued since he left the EU and regained his position in international issues. For him, the support of the Biden government also means that the United States has decided to stand toward him, not with Europe when discussing China's rise. A more easily ignored disadvantage of this Treaty is the common risk of nuclear weapons, although unlikely Australia will soon begin to develop ideas about nuclear weapons. So far, the rule is Any country with a nuclear energy-run submarine is also the holder of nuclear weapons. Allowing Australia, a non-nuclear country, possessing such submarines is a large gap that causes countries like Iran to buy nuclear energy submarines from China or Russia; or other nuclear weapons countries such as India, Pakistan or Korea decided to make the submarine pushing with nuclear energy. Lien Minh in the Norwegian newspaper Today on September 27, Frank Bakke-Jensen - Norwegian Defense Minister announced that October 1 will sign a military cooperation agreement with Sweden and Denmark, acknowledge a serious security policy crisis in Northern Europe Affecting all Nordic countries. This cooperation includes information exchange and general planning. The agreement vision is to be ready to coordinate actions in the period of time, and if there is a conflict occurred. Although denying, there is information that the Fa is asking to strengthen the EU troops. In fact, in many EU countries, people are worried about security and uncomfortable with the American behavior in NATO. NATO is a very effective alliance during the Cold War. But after the Soviet Union disbanded in 1991, NATO's role became no longer suitable, in particular, when most Warsaw countries joined EU or NATO, or keeping the distance with Russia. So NATO is only a burden of the US economy, and has significantly lowered the meaning of this block. NATO became a trade, political or diplomatic alliance. In fact, the United States has been using NATO for political purposes only. At the time of attacking Iraq, the United States used this facility to legitify the Iraq war. Although, the reason is false because there are no mass destruction weapons in Iraq. After that, the British Prime Minister must apologize to public news. . Dịch vụ:
Thiết kế website,
quảng cáo google,
đăng ký website bộ công thương uy tín
