Former US president sued three large technology platforms because of censorship and banning him. However, legal professionals receive a short value and difficulty lawsuits. 7/7, former US President Donald Trump announced a facebook, Twitter and Google for censorship and prohibitions. However, according to CNN, courts often rejected similar lawsuits. The lawsuit reported after companies simultaneously prohibited by Mr
. Trump because of the riots in Capitol hills on January 6. Twitter banned the former US president's door completely, and Facebook blocked his access to a minimum of 2 years. Houlette also banned the door Mr
Trump in January 1. However, they restored his account in March. The technology company has continuously rejected criticism that they discriminate against the party-based ideology Donald Trump announced the lawsuit of large technology platforms because of censorship and banning him. Photo: Reuters. TRUMP long-term force affirmed the lawsuit submitted to the Federal Court in Florida to ask companies to compensate for damage. From the beginning of the President's term, Mr. Trump was aimed at companies that he said was a threat to his political brand. When there was an incumbent, former US President signed an executive order to aim "Prevent online censorship" and seek to expand legal responsibilities for technology companies. However, technology companies are allowed to run their platforms in a suitable way. The courts have rejected a series of similar lawsuits
In the announcement of deleting Mr. Trump's account, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube cited the ability to excuse violence in the future or risks for the following community safety The Violence in Capitol in January was in January. In the press conference on July 7, Mr. Trump said it was asking a court in Florida to "order immediately stopping illegal and shameful censorship of the Social media company for American people ". "We will force major technology companies to be responsible," he stressed.In Trump filed a facebook, Twitter and Google and CEOs including Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai and Jack Dorsey. Photo: Reuters. Excellent for an hour after the event, the team of Trump and the Republican National Committee began calling for fundraising related to lawsuits. Complaints against Twitter, Facebook and YouTube for Censored and prohibited Mr. Trump from the foundation. Their decisions are accused of violating freedom of speech according to the first criminal practice. Before, similar decisions of companies are protected by Section 230 of the Communication Act in 1934 , Allow legal exemption for the content of users posted by users. "Lack of values and difficulties" "Plaintiffs are pleased to ask the Court to ban the definition and inspection Procedures or limitations in many forms of President Trump's posts and plaintiffs (censorships and account locks like Mr. Trump ", the Twitter complaint stated. To the way the platforms try to resolve the spread of false information about Covid-19 pandemic. In particular, the platforms have been based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to determine the main Determination of information.ba Among the requirements The claim to give is to recover his trump account immediately and other plaintiffs, Delete the warning label on the former President's posts and a decision to claim item 230 (Communication Act in 1934). Hi Hien. In May, Florida has passed the law to allow politicians to be banned Or delete the talent from social networks that have the right to sue companies. Everything in Trump's lawsuit is unreasonable. It was not surprising that he was interested in filing the laws of the Schwartzman, senior adviser at the Bentontuyen Institute of course, legal efforts against the technology platforms against the current law and the constitution. Last week, a federal judge had prevented the laws of Florida in effect. The judge's judgment said this law was contrary to the section 230.Theo CNN, Mr. Trump failed to turn the US government's apparatus to fight technology companies. Now, he must ask the court. However, the former President could hardly succeed. Legal experts believe that Mr. Trump's arguments lack values and are difficult to succeed. "Everything in Mr. Trump's lawsuit is unreasonable. Nothing Surprised when he was interested in filing against Family lawsuits, "said Andrew Schwartzman, a senior adviser at the Benton Institute, commenting." Jobs for the Government exchange platforms, even cooperation to suppress People who violate the law or threaten national security, do not turn them into state tools, "he affirmed. . Dịch vụ:
Thiết kế website,
quảng cáo google,
đăng ký website bộ công thương uy tín
