Since Australia announced that there will be a nuclear energy-based submarine, there have been a lot of speculation about what kind of submarine will be put into 'sights' navy. Questions still leave openly Australia will own any kind of nuclear submarine? It is certainly basically, Australia's new nuclear submarine will be designed by England or America. Australian-American-American partners (Aukus) have 18 months to make selections and plans. Because Australia's current Collins submarine is in need of replacing soon. There are 5 main options to consider - the first two are the existing designs - American Navy's Virginia class, and Astute class - Royal Navy Brother
. Then the submarine programs attack the next generation correspondingly, SSN (X) and SSN (R). And finally, a completely new design but uses American and British technology. More ambitious, that can be a native design with minimizing technology from the US or UK
Other considerations may include the fourth national design as France or India, or China or Russia. It can also be improved using used submarines, even older ballistic missiles (SSBN) as an attack submarine. But so far, no of these solutions are actually mentioned in the original announcement and will not be reviewed in this article. First, Virginia class submarine - US reliable attack submarine Many people are more interested. No one doubts its ability and the similarity to the US Navy will bring about training and support benefits. This Virginia ships use US weapons systems that the Royal Navy Australia (Ran) Already in stock, such as torpedo MK.48 ADCAP. The vertical launcher VLS of this vessel is compatible with US Tomahawk cruise missiles, dubbed the American "super assassin". According to the information and evaluation, the US Virginia Block-IV vessel will have 12 missiles, for improved Block-V will be 40 missiles. High Block-IV ability will appear because the amount of fire seems fit and sufficient
There is the towel, perhaps the production cost of the US Virginia class when establishing production in Australia. Next is the class submarine Astute of the British Royal Navy, was evaluated as possible to be equivalent to US Virginia.2 This vessel layer was similar in size and overall ability. But with his Astute ship will have a few more attractive advantages. For example, unlike Virginia, when the last of the Royal Navy's Astute submarine will be completed and launched in the next few years. This means that he can release the machines and equipment I am and shipping to Australia, saving costs and considerable time. Another potential advantage of ASTUTE submarines, these submarines have a smaller number of crews. Specifically, Astute has 98-109 crews, contrary to Virginia usually needs the appearance of 135 members. Compared to Collin, Astute's logistics demand has increased at least double (Collin has 58 crews). Size, Astute is smaller than Virginia, but still in line with a long-range nuclear submarine. One drawback, perhaps that Astute's current nuclear reactor is PWR2 has stopped producing. That can be replaced with PWR3 or a US nuclear reactor, but still interrupting the completion process. But anyway, the Astute class submarine still fits the needs of Ran. They are also compatible with Tomahawk.hai journey to the next selection, which is the participation of existing next generation submarines, including SSN (X) and SSN (R). This can help Australia participate in the world nuclear submarine club. These generations of attack submarine have been improved, advances for push engines, with showing sonar, ability stealth, integrated with underwater vehicles without motor, etc. Will be applied. It also allows parties like the US and he shares directly on development costs. The challenge will only be a matter of time, when Australia needs a new submarine in the 2040s. SSN (X) and SSN (R) are expected to launch in 2030. But now, milestones This project is very vague, not determined correctly. And finally, in a separate way, Australia can make a submarine suitable for its needs, based on the use of the British or American key technology. It is possible to achieve a smaller, cheaper ship but will still bring to certain advantages with nuclear energy. Of course, this is very difficult to meet big design problems. So, options will still be more feasible for this country, when choosing submarines to replace Collins. The actual image of the current Collins submarine of the Royal Australian Navy. Source: Royal Australian Navy.Minh Hoang . Dịch vụ:
Thiết kế website,
quảng cáo google,
đăng ký website bộ công thương uy tín
