The legal battle between the European Union (EU) and Poland around the judicial reform that the Warsaw government promotes increasingly deadlock, raising the question of the future member of the Eastern European country. The protester opposes a new polish government regulation on women's rights. Photo: Getty Images in 2017, Poland National Assembly through the Supreme Court Reform Bill with many new points related to the appointment and dismissal process as well as the powers and obligations of judges and judges at the judges Court level in this country. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki considers this is necessary to resolve corruption and overhaul of judicial systems. Behavior, EU accuses the ruling party to consceed legal legislation and justice Poland (PIS) politically Justice apparatus and go against democratic values that this block is highly high
. In March, the European Commission (EC) brought Poland to the European Justice Court (ECJ) because it argued that the reform mentioned above "weakened" the independence of the Polish judicial industry. In the June 15, ECJ confirmed the focus part of Warsaw's judicial reform plan is not compatible with EU law. The current Poland's responsibility is to provide the necessary measures to remove the number of reform plans, otherwise it can be fined according to the rules of the block
Before that, the conservatives in Poland are many The EU affirms that EU is violating its own power, that judicials and courts are an internal issue of a country, decided by competent authorities and Polish laws, not Brussels. On July 13, the Polish Constitutional Court also issued a ruling asserting that ECJ's ruling against the judicial reform was not suitable for the Polish Constitution. This agency is also considering EU or Poland's laws with superiority in the country. Observing what to say about the confrontation between the EU and Poland, many legal experts warn any effort to find ways This country penalty but ignore another member because it does not comply with ECJ's decisions will be considered illegal and disrupted trust in the block. While others argue that the Polish Constitutional Court's judgment is an intentional step to weaken the power of EU law, opening the trend for leaving the legal order of the block. According to the Senior Judge of the Dutch Kees Sterk, the European Law will no longer be valid if a country applies another country. Particularly former Chairman of EU Board Donald Tusk forecast PIS Party step by step bringing Warsaw to leave the Alliance.Gia entered the EU in 2004, the relationship between Poland and Brussels fell into conflict since the PIS Party took power in 2015 and initiated the extensive judicial reform program. Many people who recognize the Huge Union in Warsaw can be promoted by countries that have been continuing to challenge the boundaries of EU law and platform values. In this context, Poland's departure (Poexit) can be mentioned, especially when Polish nationalism considers the model he left EU as a precedent to strengthen legality in the statements About the rule of law
However, analysts believe that the possibility of Poexit is unlikely to happen by Warsaw and even Hungary is among the most beneficiaries from the EU. But it is also the fact that some countries no longer follow the general rules while still receiving the financial support of the block, making the remaining members cannot continue to accept. Therefore, the EU is expected to be easily concessed to violates the democratic standards of the Union. On July 15, this block has started legal action against Poland and Hungary for violating the basic rights related to gay, bisexual, transgender and gender diversity (LGBTQ). This is the latest contradiction between the Alliance and the two member states in Eastern Europe after the allegations of judicial independent violations, free communication and rights of women (according to AFP, France 2) . Dịch vụ:
Thiết kế website,
quảng cáo google,
đăng ký website bộ công thương uy tín
